JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 27, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Wilfran Icidro Manga Torres·Respondent Tribunal Administrativo De Bolivar

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia
  • Se remite el expediente al juez de primera instancia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Administrativo de Bolívar y el Tribunal Superior de Mocoa.

Teniendo en cuenta que el accionante optó por presentar la acción de tutela ante el mencionado Tribunal Administrativo, considera la Corte que es este despacho judicial quien a prevención, debe conocerla.

En consecuencia, se ordena remitir el expediente a esa Corporación para que de manera inmediata tramite y decida de fondo el amparo presentado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTO el auto del 11 de marzo de 2016 del Tribunal Administrativo de Bolívar de la acción de tutela de Wilfran Icidro Manga Torres en contra de la Policía Nacional.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente ICC-2422 al Tribunal Administrativo de Bolívar, para que de manera inmediata tramite y decida de fondo el amparo presentado.
  3. Tercero. Por la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Mocoa, la decisión adoptada en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.